Heraclitus and the European Working Time Directive

Here's a post from a guest author - a highly regarded NHS stalwart - who is nearer the end of his consultant career than the beginning. A role model, no less, if you aspire to be a great orthopaedic surgeon without losing your humanity and affability. I haven't identified him, intentionally, but he's not me. 


He's responding to a post in the BMA news. There's lots of this stuff out there (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and I even blogged on it myself.  See what you think. By and large he's right - this is real world medicine from a real world expert.


Front Page of BMA News:     

“One I am terribly sorry to have to say this but we have to train our young doctors to be prepared for life in the real world and not for life in some utopian fantasy land. I agree that the life of a trainee is less satisfactory nowadays than it was in the 1970s and 1980s where although hours of work were much longer and more arduous, and pay for overtime was only 1/3 of the basic rate, and when you could be on call on a 1:2, 138 hours in a week, you were valued, cherished, appreciated, helped by your seniors and by experienced nurses. You would live in the “Mess” with fellow housemen experiencing the same joys and hardships. These times have gone. 

At that time Housemen and Housewomen were expected to take on, and did take on responsibilities that our current young doctors would baulk at, but it prepared them well for the future. I fail to see how “sleep deprivation” can possibly be a problem in a situation where our trainees work shifts and never work more than 48 hours average a week. These are young, generally healthy, men and women.  Why should they be any less able to deal with a bit of hard work than we were? 

We have gone too far in our efforts to adhere to European Working Time Directives especially when those who travel in Europe and elsewhere know that the trainees there (in common with trainees in America, Australia, Canada and New Zealand) work much longer hours without complaint as they realise that it is the only way to become experienced enough to deal with the rigors of a senior appointment. 

I had the unedifying experience of hearing young trainees described as “Babydocs” by someone in our Deanery which I felt was not only demeaning to the mature men and women who had spent 5 years at University and another year as an FY1, but indicative of the lack of insight in our educationalists who do not begin to appreciate that the sooner someone stands up and takes responsibility for their own actions, the better equipped they will be in later life to deal with the difficult decisions that come to all of us. 

Medicine is not an easy job. People who can’t manage to cope with the stresses and strains, with the long hours and challenges may be better to be advised at an earlier stage to consider an alternative career."

The great man has just looked at the New Deal regulations...

You may think it's harsh, the voice of an old fart, perhaps, who doesn't get the groovy new way of doing things. I'm afraid though, that some aspects of medicine don't change. Two of our most effective operations today, for example, were practised by Hippocrates and his pals, in not dissimilar ways to our current techniques - amputation and draining abscesses. 

Note that part of this relates not to service delivery or alleged risks to patients from 'tired doctors', but to the happiness and job satisfaction of the medics themselves. However physically and mentally challenging work has been, there is immense satisfaction from having done it and done it well. A point neatly encapsulated by another experienced medic, Theodore Dalrymple, in a classic Spectator piece:

No one wants to be treated by a dog-tired doctor, but even less does he/she want to be the parcel in the medical game of pass-the-parcel that is now commonplace in our hospitals. The European Working Time Directive has transformed doctors into proletarian production-line workers, much to their dissatisfaction with their work and to the detriment of their training and medical experience. It means that doctors no longer work in proper teams, patients don’t know who their doctors are and doctors don’t know who their patients are. The withdrawal of the directive would improve the situation.

Medicine in general, and surgery in particular, is ruled by Eternal Verities**, whatever the New Deal, the EWTD and the BMA say. 

  **although he didn't invent the term, Greek philosopher and writer, Heraclitus, from about two and a half thousand years ago, was the father of the Eternal Verities. He realised that reason and wisdom are what leads to contentment, with all the moral, metaphysical and religious implications that might flow from that. Somewhat more profound than complaining after not getting a mandatory 30 minutes break following 4 hours of work (or whatever this week's formula is).

The best hip fracture ever?

Taken from Twitter. No comment required:

Naaman orthopaedics: avoiding the complex option

Ferdinand Bol, Elisha refusing the gifts of Naaman, 1661. Rembrandthuis, Amsterdam

Most orthopaedic surgeons are renowned biblical scholars, so they will be aware that the earliest example of "keep it simple, stupid" in medicine, was probably in the Book of Kings in the Old Testament, so around 600 BC.

The story in question is that of Naaman. A recap:

Naaman was a general in the pagan Syrian army, and a confidant of the king. Unfortunately he was also a leper, a big deal then (and now). he happened to have a slave girl who was a captured Israelite, who pointed out that back where she came from - Samaria - there was a prophet who could cure him, Elisha. As nothing else had worked, Naaman went for it. He loaded up with gifts and a fancy retinue, and headed south. His first mistake was to go to the king of Israel, who got mad when Naaman quizzed him, on the reasonable grounds that he couldn't cure leprosy, so the Syrians were clearly at it.

Elisha got wind and sent a message to have Naaman visit him. So the whole convoy ended up at Elisha's place. I'll let the scripture take over here:

Elisha sent a messenger to him, saying, “Go and wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored to you and be clean.” 11 But Naaman was furious and went away and said, “Behold, I thought, ‘He will surely come out to me, and stand and call on the name of the LORD his God, and wave his hand over the place, and cure the leper.’ 12 “Are not Abanah and Pharpar, the rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? Could I not wash in them and be clean?” So he turned and went away in a rage.

I can understand it, I suppose. However, the unnamed slave girl was not impressed:

“My father, had the prophet told you to do some great thing, would you not have done it? How much more then,when he says to you, ‘Wash, and be clean’?” 

So he did, and it worked. No more leprosy. And I believe that the long term clinical outcome remained satisfactory, although I don't have the PROMS data.

Thank you for sticking with me this far. Why does this matter in orthopaedics? Well, here are a few examples:

1. The CSAW RCT showed that operating on subacromial pain was not really any better than not operating

2. The PROFHER trial, even at 5 years, showed no benefit in operating on proximal humeral fractures than not operating (I accept that there will be some self-evident exceptions to this)

3. The DRAFFT RCT found no benefit of locking plate fixation over MUA and K wires for distal radius fractures (I accept that there will be some self-evident exceptions to this, too)

4. (my favourite) Complex, expensive and fiddly revision femoral stems are no better than the unfashionable monobloc ones, which are also much easier to use. Modular may also have more implant specific complications.

I am very far from being a surgical Luddite, nor do I tend to favour conservative management - although it's a skill we need to teach more in certain areas. But...

...there is no intrinsic merit in complicating treatments, although there are many intrinsic potential risks.

Alt.orthopaedics: 10 things I hate about you

Orthopaedic surgeons are well known for being romcom fans, of course, so it seems appropriate to reprise the title of one of the more adventurous examples of the genre - given that it's a straight lift from Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew - which is 10 Things I Hate About You.

This post derives from a recent conversation with consultant colleagues from various other hospitals, the chat turning to the most annoying habits/traits/actions of trainees. We're not saints ourselves, we know we annoy, frighten and upset our trainees occasionally - no gain without pain etc.

In fact we love our trainees, really, but sometimes you end up meeting situations that are really, really annoying. It's best to know these things, both to amend one's errant behaviour now, if as a trainee you recognise yourself in the list, or just as importantly, to prepare yourself for the weighty responsibilities of being a consultant, and having to yourself nurture the delicate talents of future generations.

Please note, any trainees/residents who read this, I am very happy to publish your Top 10, 9, 8  whatever, things you hate about consultants, attendings etc. Just get in touch or add something in the comments

So, in no particular order:

1. Inappropriate familiarity

I don't think most surgeons are too up themselves. Friendliness and camaraderie are by far the commonest features of the trainer/trainee relationship, in my experience. Most trainees recognise that there is an assumed (and inevitable) hierarchy, and that it's there for a reason. One day they will sit at the top of it. Not all trainees seem to get it though. The famous incident that springs to mind relates to a shoulder surgeon painstakingly dissecting in the axilla in an unusual and complex trauma case. As the axillary vessels came into view, with the theatre atmosphere quiet and a little tense, the trainee exclaimed "...whoah! Easy there, tiger".

Not good.

2. Obsequiousness.

It doesn't hurt the patient, but boy, can it be irritating. My favourite example is the experienced and highly regarded surgeon who'd been pestered by a visiting surgeon in the department to allow him to scrub in, to which he assented, out of courtesy. The visitor's attitude was grovelling from the start, larding praise on unremarkable observations in a particularly annoying way. The nadir came early, when after starting a standard total knee replacement, the visitor lavished praise on the execution of the incision.

Too much. Way too much.

3. Telling the surgeon how other people do it

Actually, all of us gain the odd pearl from our trainees, based on what they've encountered elsewhere. Indeed, it can add to the camaraderie.

But...

Some trainees have a tendency - possibly induced by nervousness - to spend operations telling the boss how someone else they've come across does the procedure. It doesn't matter that you're the world expert with thousands of cases under your belt, they're still going to persecute you with tidbits that frankly you don't want, nor need, to hear. Reps do it too.

My worst ever offender had done 6 months in a bone tumour unit. It's amazing how virtually every procedure has a bone tumour link, if you try hard enough.

4. Tiredness

Actually, I've never had this happen to me, but there have been occasions when during a busy on call the boss asks the trainee if they'd like to do the case and they reply, something on the lines of "not really, I'm pretty tired". It may be true, it may even be 'prudent' (on dubious safety grounds), it may have the virtue of candour.

However, it is highly unlikely to make your boss admire you more.

5. Not taking advice (or instruction, as it's otherwise known)

If I say to the trainee, this ankle fracture would benefit from a stronger plate such as a  DCP on the fibula, and a syndesmosis screw (a real example), it is only in part a fascinating clinical discussion. It is also a not-very-coded instruction to actually do that. When the postop X ray shows a third tubular plate and no syndesmosis screw, it creates mysterious feelings of anger and disappointment. When, on questioning, the trainee says that they did it because an even more junior trainee said "that's all it needs", these feelings well up and may lead to unpleasantness.

If you decide not to follow instructions, then let your boss know at the time. Another interesting discussion will ensue.

5. Economy with the truth

A phrase which reached maturity in the heady days of the Thatcher era. It does not sit well in clinical practice. An example will suffice:

Trainee arrives late for the first theatre case, but seems to be expecting to do the operation...

"Why are you late?"

"I was at the trauma meeting"

"I didn't see you there"

"I was on the ward"

"Oh, what was Mrs Smith's last haemoglobin?"

"...er...12.5"

You know where this is heading. The wretched trainee had not been in the trauma meeting, on the ward, or seen Mrs Smith. There is no need to lie, as it's normally called. But once you do, you will easily be found out, if your boss can be bothered. Your card is marked. You now have a (deserved) reputation. Being late is a far lesser crime than lying.

6. Picking on underlings.

One Saturday night, in the middle of a weekend on call, a Junior House Office (F1 doctor in today's money) knocked on my office door, and was weeping profusely. She stated that she'd had enough, and was quitting medicine. This had two effects on me at the time. One was a genuine sympathy given the real distress that she was feeling. The other was the annoyance at being landed with a problem of this kind at the wrong point in the week. What had happened to her?

Well, as is often the case in acute surgical practice, a patient had become profoundly unwell postoperatively. I forget the details at this point, but she'd struggled with both diagnosis and initial management, and had called the registrar, quite correctly. He quickly sorted things out then had a go at her, concluding with the stinging rebuke "you nearly killed this patient", which wasn't remotely true. He had major self aggrandisement traits, average surgical skills, and a tendency to be jovially matey with the consultants. Wrecking his colleague's week was meat and drink to him. It wasn't the first time.

Another example. The urology registrar wanted the image intensifier for calculus removal, fair enough.  However, the radiographer was just about to start a hip fixation, and the urologist wanted to get home (this was a Saturday morning). His next tactic, with the 'lowly' radiographer? "If my patient suffers because of this delay, I'll make sure that you're sacked!"

I had no idea the lad had so much power. Typically though, when I phoned him to point out his 'behavioural issues', he turned into full grovel mode, and claimed he was just worried for his patient. Of course he was.

As the saying goes: The same people you misuse on the way up, you'll meet up with -  on the way down




7. Not visiting the bedside.

This got a whole post devoted to it. The problem is getting worse. Recent examples include: a patient with back and leg pain, previous disc prolapse and intermittent difficulty in peeing. The neurosurgeon, busy playing the odds, said at the end of the phone "doesn't sound like a cauda equina problem". He didn't come to see the patient. Another: possible necrotising fasciitis (treated mortality ~ 25%, untreated mortality ~ 100%) in an oncology patient (not an 'orthopaedic' problem in our hospital), the plastic surgeon said "it's cellulitis", we're not seeing it. Ho hum.

Read the post.

8. Complacency.

In the UK, if you get an orthopaedic training job in what is called 'run through training' - for which the competition is fierce - then you're set up for 8 years, barring death, emigration, imprisonment, or possibly, these days, a new career in reality TV.

This happy state does have some negative consequences, however. Here's just one example. In the days when you had to reapply for a job after three years you might be trying harder to impress. In my case this would mean that after two years as a registrar I would (reasonably) expect a trainee to know all the common fracture classifications, apply them, and discuss the 'classic' papers (eg femoral nailing: 1, 2), plus the most recent journal stuff of note. That will all come from self learning, which with the internet is easier than ever.  And it does happen, sometimes. Often as not though there'll be blank looks at the trauma meeting. People tend to view this stuff as exam preparation - which it is - as opposed to helpful in practice - which it is as well.

Complacency actually stops people from discovering what a treasure trove the published literature - old and new - actually is. If you don't know the Lauge-Hansen classification after two years of training jobs, you are officially complacent.

9. "Yes, I know how to do this"

Actually quite a nuanced complaint, raised by an esteemed colleague. When a trainee is starting out with a new boss, however experienced the trainee is, there will still be things you can learn (good and bad). Therefore when, at the start of your first lists together, your boss says something like "can you do a knee replacement", an answer along the lines of "yes, no problem" may in fact be counterproductive. Particularly if the boss is fairly expert in the procedure.

Far better to say that yes, you've done quite a few, but there's always stuff you can pick up, and it would be great to assist in the first instance, to see how the boss likes it to be done.

A small distinction, you might say, possibly even pandering to someone's surgical ego, God forbid. But one of the greatest virtues you can take into your burgeoning surgical career is humility. For lots of reasons.

10. Ingratitude.

The state has probably trained you in medicine to the tune of about £250,000 (for UK readers). After that you've been paid well, with years of job security,  and you are possibly on the way to become an actual expert, courtesy of the taxpayer. People have let you practice on their bodies, potentially to their detriment. Unless you royally screw up, the chances are that you'll have guaranteed and well remunerated employment - with a handsome pension, paid sick leave, study leave, maternity/paternity leave, parental leave - for 20-30 years.

Not bad, eh?

So when you reach the consultant pinnacle, it doesn't look that great, when you either:

a. Declare that you don't do procedures X, Y and Z, even if they work and are needed in the population you serve, because you only want to do procedure A. This is often dressed up in a spurious 'safety' argument. It is a common example of entitlement, a harbinger of troubles to come.

b. Disappear into private practice.

Seriously, spend a few years honing your general skills, getting peer credibility and respect, and gradually establishing an authentic subspecialty expertise. It's only fair.

...this is what it was like in the 1980's, kids...

Lessons from the movies - how to be a consultant surgeon

When the more senior trainees approach me, as they frequently do, seeking my advice on how to behave as a consultant, I can offer no greater example than this early training film**:



Of course he's a dinosaur, completely out of touch with the modern world - the labs haven't done the bleeding time for years.

**under no circumstances should you base your practice on this other movie.

PS: thanks to my Greenock colleagues for the recommendation

The midnight hour

Even with the lousy anti-training New Deal foisted on the medical profession by the BMA and their dweebish unclinical negotiators, junior doctors - if the term is still permitted - can still end up doing a true on call, rather than shifts, and can still be called in in the middle of the night.

It seems not to be like it was however, and in many ways that's a good thing.

In the early 90's, before we had consultants in Casualty (which became A&E, now Emergency Medicine, these guys are very into semantics), patients still survived. I do welcome senior Casualty/A&E/Emergency Medicine presence, and I'm sure it's saved a few lives, though there can be a downside in terms of ownership of the case and the early decision making. But I digress.

It was correctly recognised that having a raw untutored SHO trying to resuscitate two polytraumas on his or her own, waiting for the cavalry to arrive, was not ideal. I've been there, it was pretty tough. So in my hospital we instituted the 'Trauma Bleep'. The deal was that there were three pagers held by the senior registrar in orthopaedics (me), the senior registrar in general surgery, and the senior registrar in anaesthetics (the important one, though I hate to admit it). If the bleep went off, you went straight to Casualty, no questions asked. It worked over many miles, so there was no escape. In any event, there were no mobile phones then, if you were out and thought you'd call in to see if you were really needed.

Most of the calls were not that critical, plenty of low grade stabbings that barely made it through the dermis, but there were still quite a lot of people who benefited from rapid resuscitation, airway security and all that. It coincided with the emergence of ATLS in the UK and the whole thing was really a big step forward in quality.

However, it could be bruising. My worst night I went in (a 6 mile round trip, so not too bad) at 11.30pm, got home at 2am, in again at 3am, home at 4.30am, in again at 5.30am, home for a shower at 7.30, staggering in to work for a full day starting at 8.30am. None of the cases was major trauma, but we were there, just in case.

You have to be at the bedside/trolley side to properly assess things, and it's a dying art.

I'm not recommending a return to that, but I still do on call from home, and I still go in. It's easier now as a consultant - much easier in fact, for various reasons - than it was 10 years ago and 20 years ago, when we were always having to go back in.

All this is a long winded preamble to a piece lifted in its entirety from the magnificent GomerBlog, which is mostly written by frontline clinicians. You can always tell....



On-call ophthalmologist heroically manages eye emergency from bed

DES MOINES, IA – Answering his phone in a daze at 2 AM last night, on-call ophthalmologist Reece Barnett reportedly handled a vision threatening eye emergency from the comfort of his nice warm bed.

“It was intense,” says Barnett.  “At first I was propped up on one elbow when I answered the phone. Then the emergency doc told me the patient had severe vision loss.  At that point, I sat straight up in bed with my down comforter only covering my legs.  I started getting a chill, but you gotta take these things seriously.” 

Barnett was able to listen to the patient’s history in between yawns, occasionally having the consulting doctor repeat things while he rubbed the crust from his eyes.  After several seconds of thoughtful consideration, Barnett thought it would be best to see the patient in clinic in the morning.

“This was a tough situation,” reports Barnett.  “By the end of the conversation, my sheet was all bunched up and my pillow was flat in all the wrong places.”  When asked why he elected to see the patient in the morning, Barnett replied, “By the time I get out of bed, get in my car, drive all the way to the hospital and see the patient, it will only be a few hours until morning anyway.  This is the best thing for the patient.”

At press time, Barnett was seen coordinating care for a patient with ocular trauma while wearing his eye mask.

I don't want to just pick on the eye guys, when did the on-call (and paid for it) dermatologist/breast surgeon/nearly all physicians/psychiatrist last come in at 3 in the morning?

It's bad enough trying to get a bedside visit during the day**.

**there are of course many honourable exceptions to this genuine and somewhat alarming trend

Celebrity trauma: Deniz Tek

Deniz with Iggy

In a bland era of X Factor music, you need someone like Deniz Tek. As the great man put it, talking about the onset of punk, following what he calls the 'post-hippie malaise period' of the early 70's (I remember it well):

At last, somebody getting back to basics. You compare it to maybe one or two years before, everybody’s listening to a triple album by Yes called Tales from Topographic Oceans, and if there’s anything more boring in the world, you’d have to tell me about it. That was just the epitome to us of the dreadfulness and horror of what music had become, and it was a breath of fresh air when these New York bands started blowing all that away.

There's a lot out there on this polymath, but put simply, if you like punk, metal, surf music, and the darker edges of those, like fellow Australians (sort of) The Saints playing Nights In Venice, then you'll love Tek and his awesome band, Radio Birdman. Or as this website said, he’s the “axe-wielding rock soldier commanding the legendary Radio Birdman blitzkrieg”, which is about right. Think also Stooges, MC5 (both bands were his buddies), Blue Oyster Cult, early Alice Cooper etc. Halcyon days.

But why am I writing this? Most orthopaedic surgeons these days seem to listen to Ed Sheeran or U2, who make the previously mentioned Yes seem like the Sex Pistols. The above named bands are the antidote.

Well Tek is different. When he was in his band in Australia (he's actually from Michigan) in the 70's he was studying medicine at the University of NSW. He got the textbooks out on tour.

In the 80’s he joined the US Navy, based in Hawaii and ended up as a flight surgeon organising medic evacuations, major trauma protocols and delivering emergency care all over the world, in all climates. His radio call sign actually was Ice Man.

He subsequently went on to run an Emergency Medicine service with a lot of trauma in Montana, and now combines music with painting, writing and doing EM work part time in both the US and Australia. You thought you had a complicated life?

Here he is on the professional medic/rock musician dichotomy:

"usually if it's a busy shift or there's heavy things going down I don't think of anything else until the shift's over. The other thing is you can compartmentalise and whilst I'm taking care of sick people music doesn't intrude. I think that in aviation there's a lot of value in that also. Guys that climb into the cockpit of a jet have to be able to leave their family problems behind. Y'know...the wife's goin' out with someone else or the kid's on drugs. They climb into that cockpit and if they don't do everything exactly right they're gonna die...and may be kill other people too.

One of the requisites for that is to totally compartmentalise your mind.  They screen pilots for that ability in psychological tests. If you're not that sorta person...you're just not right for the job."

Fair point - ever had the stress-inducing bleep about a family matter when you’re  in the middle of a long operation? Compartmentalise!

His website is excellent on many levels, but I particularly commend this tale of being called out to a military plane crash in Arizona. Even the Guardian likes him.

He gives career advice too:

"Any encouraging words to the young kiddies?


Work hard at whatever it is you like to do. Nothing worthwhile comes easy. And stop complaining."